(Note, Hebrews are a race and not all Hebrew's are Jews. The Jews comprise of all races and mixed raced people, and some are anti-zionist. The Jews are not a race! But this article pushes the lie that Jews are a race, and suggests that "White" Muslims that put their race above a genocidal regime and cult be accepted by pro-Whites but that a "White" Jew could not do the same because Judiasm is a "race"... FFS!? They also used the well demonised term "White" nationalist!? Do they like beating dead horses also!? So I am sharing a modified version... See link if you wish to read the original.)
Whites have had our destinies controlled by non-whites for so long that we find it difficult to even think in terms of our own interests anymore. So in this debate, some of us end up being more pro-Muslim and anti-Jewish than pro-White . Others tend to be more anti-Muslim and pro-Jewish (or at least anti-anti-Jewish) than pro-white.
But we don’t have to pick either Jews or Muslims. It is not an either/or. We don’t have to take sides in their fights. We need to take our own side and recognize that white interests differ from those of both groups.
What line should pro-Whites take regarding Jews and Muslims?
1. Neither group has any place in our societies. Thus our aim is the most complete separation possible from Jews and Muslims.
2. However, we need to deal forthrightly with the sticky question of how these groups are defined. (Judiasm and) Islam is a religion, thus anybody who thinks of himself as a (Jew or a) Muslim is (one), including white converts. By the same token, though, we should have no problem with genetically white (Jewish and) Muslim apostates.
3. With (White Ashkanazi Jews and) Muslims, the essential issue here strikes me as one of consciousness, rather than (genes). There are groups that we recognize as European that have some Near Eastern admixture. We should have no more problem, then, with (non-Jews and) non-Muslims with some Near Eastern ancestry as we have with any other whites with some Near Eastern ancestry.
4. There are whites today who have some Jewish ancestry (that may or may not mean Hebrew, that may mean "White" converts). Genetically, they may be no more Near Eastern than many Greeks or Italians. (White ethnostateS and by that I mean, all of our territories reclaimed! Not one state, a sitting duck, a people pushed into the corner of the globe, surrounded by hostile forces!) might wish to know who these people are and keep an eye on them, but unless they choose to identify as otherwise, it seems reasonable to consider them whites, not Jews.
5. Recognizing that some whites might have some non-European ancestry is not, of course, an argument against rigorously preventing any more such hybridization. As a general rule, I think we should be less focused on the race that we have been and more focused on the race we wish to become. If it really bothers us, someday we will be in the position to edit out alien genetic code. But we will never reach that day unless we halt miscegenation in the here and now, the sooner the better.
6. It is possible that white nations might have amicable relations with Jewish and Muslim communities. It is possible for whites to feel sympathy for the suffering of Muslims and Jews (indeed, all too much). It is possible that Jewish and Muslim interests might overlap with white interests from time to time, in delimited ways. Such commonalities of interests can be the basis of limited, mutually beneficial political alliances.
7. But not today. Not in this world. There should be no talk of amicable relations, sympathy, or political alliances with Jews or Muslims as long as they are occupying our nations, oppressing our people, and threatening our long-term biological and cultural survival.
9. First, we must attain separation. Only then we can talk about good relations. If, however, out of excessive idealism or pragmatism we entangle ourselves with our enemies, we will never be able to separate ourselves. Thus Pro-Whites should do everything in our power to encourage polarization between whites on the one hand and Muslims and Jews on the other. https://www.counter-currents.com/2012/10/innocence-of-muslims-guilt-of-jews-interests-of-whites/
Pamela Geller is mentioned in the article... She is not only a supremacist privileged hypocritical Zionist Jew, who is likely a mix of Arab and Hebrew, and I realized she was an anti-White when she described European's as "natural fascists". Fascist is widely used as an anti-White hate slur! Pamela is anti-white and not White. A poor example!